Comments for ezSEO Newsletter

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by galyna

galyna — Sat, 18 May 2013 04:16:29 +0000

He is excited, alright

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Marshall

Marshall — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:55:47 +0000

Maybe no one has taken time to file an FTC complaint about the situation

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Marshall

Marshall — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:50:34 +0000

They don’t care on the the Warriors Forum. They sell courses there to newbies who don’t know any better. While there are some good deals there on some things, there is some real junk too.

Kindle is becoming so competitive it is not the panacea it once was either. Unless you can pay to outsource the grunt work of promoting your books, it is very difficult to get to the break even point by yourself. Break even being where you are earning enough sales to afford to outsource. Even with 5RR, outsourcing is not cheap.

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Marshall

Marshall — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:44:45 +0000

You are right on as far as I am concerned. I hope FB continues to eat Google lunch as far as effective paid ads go. I would like to see Adwords go down the tubes. Would serve Google right for their arrogance.

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Marshall

Marshall — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:36:59 +0000

Google wants to own the internet market just like AOL did some years back. Didn’t work too well for AOL did it and eventually Google will mess up and get smacked big time by the FTC. Then maybe the playing field will level out some.

I agree Google should just let us advertise for free on their site since they are so concerned about money passing hands. Oh Yeah right, the concern is the money passes to Google’s hands.

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Andy Williams

Andy Williams — Fri, 17 May 2013 12:25:19 +0000

Andii, feel free to “double dip” whenever you want.
With regards to paying taxes in the UK, it’s not just Google. Certain “coffee houses” also get away without paying anywhere near what other UK businesses do. The fault isn’t with these companies in many cases, it’s with the UK. Until the UK close the loopholes being used by large corporations, these tax stories will continue.

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Andii

Andii — Fri, 17 May 2013 11:18:14 +0000

I don’t usually double-dip in comments, but after yesterday’s rant, I just had to back up my stance over Google as they preach to those of us that run online projects, telling us to be good, and play by ethical rules as laid by them. In other words, do as we say, not as we do, and we might give your some exposure online via our SERPs.

GOOGLE TO FACE CHARGES YET AGAIN FOR TRYING TO TRICK THE SYSTEM
Associated Press May 17, 2013

Margaret Hodge, chairwoman of a UK Parliamentary committee, criticized Google vice president Matt Brittin as well as the US search giant on Thursday, saying Google uses “smoke and mirrors to avoid paying tax.”

‘‘You are a company that says you DO NO EVIL and I think that you do, do evil in that you use smoke and mirrors to avoid paying tax.’’

The case continues….

Google SLAPS us, but who SLAPS Google?

Sadly, when Google slaps the owners of websites, that site is trashed into oblivion overnight. When Google gets slapped, it pays a fine and simply gets on with business as usual and continues to dominance of the World Wide Web …

Wouldn’t it be interesting if they got suspended from the internet for duration of time for breaking the rules, in much the same way as a sports player might be banned for a season for misconduct. That would mean all the web searchers would have to use alternatives like BING and a few others. It would certainly be interesting to see what happens to the stats of good sites with great content which were finding it hard to get found via Google.

Don’t get me wrong, there are some pretty trashy websites out there in cyberspace, many or which shouldn’t be found in the SERPs, either because they’re just poor quality (I’ve had a few myself in the past), or they are malicious in their intention. But I’m certain that this so called “Collateral damage” they speak of so casually is far more widespread than they lead us to believe.

It sometimes seems that cyber crime is being fought by cyber crooks, but that’s something for a whole other debate

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Andy Williams

Andy Williams — Fri, 17 May 2013 05:49:56 +0000

Yes, I noticed that.

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Andy Williams

Andy Williams — Fri, 17 May 2013 05:49:45 +0000

To get free traffic!

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Derek

Derek — Fri, 17 May 2013 00:17:08 +0000

Ironic that he is wearing a T-shirt with the Firefox logo on it….

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Allan Starling

Allan Starling — Thu, 16 May 2013 18:55:27 +0000

To put it rather simply, what is the point of jumping through all of these hoops to get on the first page of a Google search, when that first page is already full of paid ads?

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by David

David — Thu, 16 May 2013 16:08:57 +0000

you are spot on!
great view and good post:-)

David

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by Andy Williams

Andy Williams — Thu, 16 May 2013 15:30:01 +0000

Yes, that is quite Freudian

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by David

David — Thu, 16 May 2013 15:18:38 +0000

well said!!

David

Comment on SEO: What’s coming by Matt Cutts by David

David — Thu, 16 May 2013 15:11:45 +0000

hi,

with only quality content and no backlinks at all wont bring you to the top eather!
so what is it that google really want? my opinion is that in the future you will be paying
google just to get on the first page! and they will be the biggest affiliate them selfs:-)
guest blogging not good?? why? i see it as iff you would give flyers to people in the
ofline world, guest blogging is not only for the links but also to get customers to your sites!
what’s wrong with this!?
i think/hope they will digg there own grave when they keep on hitting on the site owners,
all the traffic they get(google) is in a way because of all the site owners optimizing for google search!
i’m against spam and web spam!! but there have to be a way to keep it fun for both party’s

David